update readme
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,3 +26,38 @@ Something's not right here, unless the hit new baby name is `kaaaaasehaaeaaal`.
|
||||
After a few more rounds of debugging, I'm stumped. There must be some subtle pythonic behavior that my rewrite isn't capturing that's causing my results to all be nonsense like `eadaaaaannnaanba` and `oetlaaceta`, but I can't see it (and I don't know enough python to find it).
|
||||
|
||||
This was still a useful learning opportunity, although a frustrating one in the end.
|
||||
|
||||
## Update September 2026
|
||||
|
||||
I asked Claude the same question I asked Copilot six months ago and after thinking for a bit, it pointed out two places where the go program's reference semantics were different than python's. With those two things fixed:
|
||||
|
||||
```plaintext
|
||||
❯ go run cmd/main.go input.txt
|
||||
num docs: 32033
|
||||
vocab size: 27
|
||||
num params: 4192
|
||||
step 10000 / 10000 | loss 2.6872
|
||||
--- inference (new, hallucinated names) ---
|
||||
sample 1: breya
|
||||
sample 2: kariste
|
||||
sample 3: kari
|
||||
sample 4: elyna
|
||||
sample 5: aliann
|
||||
sample 6: alayn
|
||||
sample 7: asari
|
||||
sample 8: amara
|
||||
sample 9: kadili
|
||||
sample 10: avan
|
||||
sample 11: aarie
|
||||
sample 12: amari
|
||||
sample 13: keli
|
||||
sample 14: kericy
|
||||
sample 15: areta
|
||||
sample 16: kailyn
|
||||
sample 17: kona
|
||||
sample 18: daley
|
||||
sample 19: avile
|
||||
sample 20: alion
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Success.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user